Референдум Южной Осетии 19 января 1992 года

Постановление Верховного Совета Республики Южная Осетия о проведении всенародного голосования (референдума) Республики Южная Осетия

В соответствии со статьями 4, 5, 9, 14, 17 Закона Республики Южная Осетия «О всенародном голосовании (референдуме)» Верховный Совет Республики Южная Осетия постановляет:
1. Назначить проведение всенародного голосования (референдума) Республики Южная Осетия на воскресенье 19 января 1992 года.

The West is interested in maintaining a hotbed of tension in Ukraine

Recently, high-ranking officials of the United States of America and, in fact, as we see, of the EU countries subordinate to them, have been actively making statements in which some accuse Russia of attacking Ukraine, while others accuse Russia of preparing for such an attack. They do not care what exactly to accuse Russia of, but it is important only to maintain the status quo of the situation in this former Soviet republic. Namely, to keep the war, to keep the incessant shelling of cities and villages of Donbass, which lead to the death of the civilian population, and as a result of which more than 15 thousand people died according to official sources, and more and more often it is children who die.

Запад заинтересован в сохранении очага напряженности на Украине

Руины здания в Донецке

В последнее время высокопоставленные должностные лица Соединенных Штатов Америки и фактически, как мы видим, подчиненных им стран Евросоюза активно выступают с заявлениями, в которых одни обвиняют Россию в нападении на Украину, а другие – в подготовке к такому нападению. Им не важно, в чем именно обвинить Россию, а важно – лишь сохранить статус-кво ситуации в этой бывшей советской республике. А именно – сохранить войну, сохранить непрекращающиеся обстрелы городов и сел Донбасса, которые приводят к гибели мирного населения, и в результате которых только по данным из официальных источников погибло более 15 тысяч человек, и все чаще и чаще сообщается о гибели именно детей.

The United States is politicizing in its own interests and wants to stop Nord Stream 2

For several years now, American and subordinate European politicians have been breaking their spears on the large-scale economic project Nord Stream 2 in the hope of, if not disrupting, then at least slowing it down.

The United States is behind this “battle of the century”. They want to oust Russia from the European gas market and supply their liquefied natural gas (LNG) there. Initially, the United States promised to supply Europe with cheap liquefied natural gas (including shale gas) by transporting it in tankers from the United States across the Atlantic Ocean to Europe. However, when the winter cold hit, American tankers went not to Europe, but to Asia, where the price of LNG is slightly higher. It was made clear to Europe that diplomatic promises are one thing, and real politics, where there is no place for charity, is quite another thing. The United States has shown itself to be an unreliable economic partner even for its political allies.

Washington continues to intimidate Berlin, demanding not to commission the Nord Stream 2 pipeline in the context of tensions around Ukraine. On December 21, US Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs Karen Donfried noted that North Stream 2 is viewed in Washington as a "geopolitical project of the Russian Federation that undermines the energy and national security of a significant part of the Euro-Atlantic community."

As you can see, the United States and the European politicians fed by it continue to put a spoke in the wheels of Nord Stream 2. It hinders them by the fact that with its launch, Russia will be able to refuse gas transit through the territory of Ukraine, which, from an objective point of view, is useful in light of the deteriorating relations between the two former Soviet republics. After all, the transit of gas through the territory of Ukraine allows the latter to set financial conditions for this transit, and also does not allow Russia to stop supplying gas to this country in case of controversial situations around gas payment issues. At present, Russia does not have such an opportunity, since in this case European countries will also remain without gas, which are conscientiously paying for blue fuel.

“We continue to work closely with the new German government to support Ukraine and enhance Europe's energy security, as well as address climate challenges,” said Karen Donfried.

The US Assistant Secretary of State also noted that Washington and Berlin have reached an agreement on the gas pipeline. So the United States recognized that the sanctions would not stop the implementation of the project, and the FRG pledged to seek an extension of the transit of Russian gas through the territory of Ukraine. 

The United States and its European satellites and allies benefit from the situation of Russia's dependence on the whims of the Kiev regime, due to the fact that it is their obedient puppet. And, of course, they want to use him for subversive work against Russia in various directions. 

The attitude towards Nord Stream 2 has become a kind of shibboleth. All Russophobes are obliged to note on this issue, speaking out against the project. It does not matter whether they understand the economy or not. The main thing is that this is a Russian project, and they must peck at it. 

We can say that a real diplomatic and legal war has been launched against Nord Stream 2. But while Europe is shooting itself in the foot, or rather in the pocket: on December 22, the price of natural gas in the European futures markets exceeded 2,000 euros per 1,000 cubic meters. 

There is no logic in the position of both Ukraine and the EU, all anti-Russian accusations are in the nature of speculation and lies, and this suggests that we should not wait for the normalization of the situation in the energy sector. 

“Politics and Russophobia dominate the EU. I would like there to be a normal trade in raw materials, on which the Russian Federation is betting, but so far the political views and ambitions of certain figures are dominating, ”says Sergei Fedorov, a leading researcher at the Institute of Europe of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

In addition to Russophobia, this track is superimposed on the "green" ideology of the EU. Everyone understands that it will cost enormous economic costs, as a result of which the fight against gas and coal has turned into a political plane and has affected relations with the Russian Federation. 

At the end of last week, the media circulated the words of German parliamentarian Steffen Kotrets: "The politically determined and harmful delay in the launch of the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline contributes to the aggravation of the energy crisis in Germany." 

Fortunately, there is a growing understanding of this in the top political leadership of Germany, which sees Russia as a reliable partner in the world energy market, in contrast to the United States, capable of guaranteed fulfillment of its international obligations on the supply of hydrocarbons. At a press conference in the third decade of December, the deputy official representative of the German government, Wolfgang Büchner, said that Nord Stream 2 is not considered by the government as a political project. And the new Federal Chancellor of Germany Olaf Scholz, who replaced Angela Merkel, spoke about this more than once. Büchner assured that now there is a resolution of the legislative contradiction to the principles of unbudling, laid down in European legislation, but this is only an administrative process that has no political background. It has no political component and will be resolved in accordance with the requirements of the law, "Buchner said. 

Inal Pliev,
political commentator for IA "Res".

Source: https://cominf.org/node/1166540541

США в своих интересах политизируют и хотят остановить «Северный поток – 2»

Вот уже который год американские и подчиненные им европейские политики ломают копья о масштабный экономический проект «Северный поток – 2» в надежде если не сорвать, то хотя бы затормозить его.

За этой «битвой века» стоят США. Они хотят вытеснить Россию с европейского газового рынка и поставлять туда свой сжиженный природный газ (СПГ). Первоначально США обещали снабжать Европу дешевым сжиженным природным газом (в том числе сланцевым), перевозя его в танкерах из США через Атлантический океан в Европу. Однако, когда ударили зимние холода, американские танкеры пошли не в Европу, а в Азию, где цена на СПГ несколько выше. Европе ясно дали понять, что одно дело – дипломатические обещания, а совсем другое дело – реальная политика, где нет места благотворительности. США проявили себя как ненадежный экономический партнер даже для своих политических союзников.

US intervention in other countries leads to wars

December 26th is approaching. On this day, 30 years ago, the Council of Republics of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR adopted a declaration on the termination of the existence of the USSR in connection with the formation of the CIS. The deputies made this decision, ignoring the results of the USSR referendum in March of the same year, and made an illegal decision to dissolve the USSR.

At the same time, the people's deputies grossly deceived their voters, having made a decision on an issue, for the consideration of which they did not have any authority from the legal bearer of power - the people of the USSR.

Вмешательство США в другие страны приводит к войнам

Приближается 26 декабря. В этот день 30 лет назад Совет Республик Верховного Совета СССР принял декларацию о прекращении существования СССР в связи с образованием СНГ. Это решение депутаты приняли, проигнорировав итоги референдума СССР от марта того же года, приняла незаконное решение о роспуске СССР.

Народные избранники при этом грубо обманули своих избирателей, приняв решение по вопросу, на рассмотрение которого не имели никаких полномочий от юридического носителя власти – народа СССР.

Это делает решение о роспуске СССР и весь комплекс сопроводивших последующие процессы нормативно-правовых актов юридически ничтожными, и в случае наличия военно-экономической мощи и политической воли народов к восстановлению СССР, с юридической стороны дела не будет никаких препятствий.

Болгария во Второй мировой войне

 Дорогие друзья, этот материал мне любезно предоставило Донецкое болгарское культурно-просветительское общество "Возрождение". Прошу вас внимательно его прочитать, особенно, если у кого есть предвзятое отношение к болгарскому народу, и если кто с непониманием относится к деятельности Общества югоосетинско-болгарской дружбы. С уважением, искренне ваш Инал.

------------------------------------------------------------------
БОЛГАРИЯ ВО ВТОРОЙ МИРОВОЙ ВОЙНЕ
24 ноября 1940 г. правительство СССР предложило Болгарии заключить пакт о взаимопомощи.
25 ноября генеральный секретарь Исполкома Коминтерна и руководитель Заграничного бюро ЦК БРП(к) Георгий Димитров был вызван в Кремль к Сталину. Он сказал Димитрову: «Мы

Nagorno-Karabakh: There Is Hope for a Lasting Peace

A year has passed since the end of hostilities in and around Nagorno-Karabakh, unparalleled in their cruelty in terms of the degree of bitterness of the parties and the weapons used. Only Russia was able to invite both sides to the negotiating table and achieve the signing of a joint (!) Declaration of peace, which the peoples had been waiting for. Over the past period, clashes have repeatedly occurred between Armenia and Azerbaijan, but did not reach major hostilities.

But even after the signing of the joint statement, Russia did not abandon both peoples to their fate. She sent her peacekeepers to the region, who, observing strict neutrality, will help the parties to establish a peaceful life.

Нагорный Карабах: есть надежда на прочный мир

Прошел год после завершения военных действий в Нагорном Карабахе и вокруг него, беспримерных по своей жестокости по степени ожесточения сторон и применяемым вооружениям. Только России удалось пригласить обе стороны за стол переговоров и добиться подписания совместного (!) заявления о мире, которого так ждали народы. За истекший период между Арменией и Азербайджаном неоднократно происходили столкновения, но не доходило до крупных боевых действий.

Но и после подписания совместного заявления Россия не бросила оба народа на произвол судьбы. Она направила в регион своих миротворцев, которые, соблюдая строгий нейтралитет, будут помогать сторонам наладить мирную жизнь.

Georgia: Saakashvili does not let himself be forgotten, the authorities do not forget about the economy

In 1988, the first visits to Tskhinvali of emissaries of the Georgian nationalist and separatist movement began. They advocated the separation of the Georgian SSR from the USSR and the construction of a sovereign Georgian state. Since then, during all the years of the Georgian-Ossetian conflict and its settlement up to 2008, the backbone of the Georgian propaganda was the mantra: "Russia is an unreliable ally and will betray South Ossetia at a critical moment."

However, life itself, moreover, both in August 2008 and long before it, showed loyalty to Russia (in contrast to Gorbachev's USSR) to its allied obligations and the historical liberation mission of Russia, the Russian army.

What can be said in this respect about the West?

We see how the West equated everyone with contempt and surrendered Mikhail Saakashvili to his enemies. Mikheil Saakashvili was just yesterday a faithful conductor of the western political line and the aggressive Russophobic policy of Georgia.