One Stroke to the Real Picture of the European Union's Attitude to the Rights of Peoples

In recent years, a paradoxical situation has begun to develop in European countries. The standard of living of the population has fallen proportionally to the decline in the real purchasing power of the euro and the national currencies tied to them with varying degrees of rigidity, but still remaining, while supporters of maintaining the previous rate have won elections time after time. Naturally, mainstream politicians and economists in these countries explained what was happening in the media by an economic crisis, but we all know that a crisis is a condition in which the previous means of achieving a goal no longer work.

However, if everyone is talking about a crisis, then why do they continue to maintain the course that led to it? Here we see a grandiose propaganda deception, because if the crisis really took place and was recognized, the

authorities would have changed their economic approaches and, in fact, their socio-economic policy. This is not happening, which allows us to make a logical conclusion that the further decline in living standards due to rising prices and the ongoing redistribution of real income in favor of large banks and corporations is not an undesirable crisis, but a consequence of the deliberate economic policy of the EU.

How else can one explain the predatory withdrawal of astronomical financial sums from the economy in times of crisis and their use for military aid to the anti-people Zelensky regime, from which the military-industrial corporations in Europe benefit, while ordinary voters-taxpayers are forced to tighten their belts?

The question arises: why, in this case, do these or those political forces win elections time after time, which only imitate insurmountable contradictions with each other, but in fact support the same political and economic system?

One might get the impression that this is due to the propaganda processing of the electorate. However, no matter how powerful the propaganda is, people see with their own eyes what is happening. Figuratively speaking, the voice of the refrigerator is louder than the TV and the Internet. Such a discrepancy between the actual processes and the voting results is abnormal. Everything becomes clear only if you understand that the elections in the EU countries are a fiction and are falsified according to a well-established system, and the opinion of voters is of no real interest to anyone.

This conclusion can be drawn from the absolutely aggressive, antagonistic position with which Brussels perceived the results of the parliamentary elections held several years ago in Hungary, Slovakia, literally before our eyes in neighboring Georgia and, most recently, the results of the presidential elections in Romania.

It would seem that the European Union verbally affirms respect for the rights of all peoples. But in this case, it should be the first to show respect for the rights of the peoples of the listed countries, namely, the right to freely elect their president and parliament by universal secret ballot of voters with the right to vote.

Brussels immediately took the Prime Minister of Hungary Orban with hostility. He was accused of revisionism, of organizing mass unrest against the European Union, and was openly deceived when discussing various financial issues, such as aid to Ukraine, when they cheated their way out of his veto. Only the military and economic strength of Hungary keeps them from taking more radical steps.

A rabid campaign of hostility and hatred was unleashed against the Prime Minister of Slovakia Robert Fico, which could only end with shots. And they were fired. Fortunately, the politician survived.

The EU Commissioner for Neighborhood and Enlargement, Oliver Várhelyi, openly threatened Georgian Prime Minister Irakli Kobakhidze with the fate of the Prime Minister of Slovakia Robert Fico, who was the subject of an assassination attempt. A good Neighborhood Commissioner, nothing to say.

But Calin Georgescu, whom the majority of Romanian voters want to see as president, is having a harder time.

Soon after the elections, in which he won the majority of votes, the results of the vote were simply... annulled, he himself was arrested and charged with serious crimes. When the material was already ready for publication, news came from Romania that the Romanian Central Election Commission had decided not to allow him to participate in the elections.

At the same time, the European Union recognizes Zelensky as the legitimate president of Ukraine, whose presidential term, according to the Constitution and current legislation of Ukraine, has long expired.

Thus, the EU, along with the rights of voters in the listed countries, also spat on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21 of which states: "The will of the people shall be the basis of the authority of government; this will shall be expressed in periodic and genuine elections which shall be by universal and equal suffrage and shall be held by secret ballot or by equivalent free voting procedures."

This is how the European Union actually treats the rights of peoples. Individual failures in the operation of the grandiose, decades-old machine of falsifying the results of national elections, which occurred in Hungary, Slovakia, Georgia and Romania, when the voices of the people became so loud that they could no longer be drowned out by any falsifications, are met with hostility by Brussels. Meanwhile, the leadership of the European Union itself is not elected by anyone, but is appointed behind the scenes, without a general direct secret vote of voters in the member countries. Despite the fact that the decisions of the European Union have a direct impact on the lives of all citizens of European states, these citizens have no legal opportunity to change the leadership of the EU and elect those politicians whom they know and trust. In South Ossetia, unlike the self-praising European Union, the issue of elections is approached very, very carefully and meticulously. In order to avoid any doubts about the honesty and transparency of the electoral process, representatives of the presidential candidates or parties participating in the parliamentary elections are present at the polling stations. They sign the back of each ballot taken by the voter on the way to the polling booth. This measure makes the violation known as “ballot stuffing” impossible. At the same time, a tiny stamp is put in the voters’ passports, with which they will not be given a ballot at any other polling station. This measure makes impossible the violation known as “carousel”, when special buses of falsifiers transport the same voters to dozens of polling stations, where they vote for the candidate for whom they were paid. After the voting procedure is completed, representatives of the candidates or parties are present during the vote counting, ensuring the accuracy of the transmitted quantitative information. If the elections of the EU leadership were held in all member states using the same methods, excluding the possibility of falsification, then not a single one of the rabid warmongers in the EU leadership, pursuing an anti-people policy towards the peoples of Europe, would receive a drop of trust.

Inal PLIEV

https://ugo-osetia.ru/obshhestvo/odin-shtrih-k-realnoj-kartine-otnosheniya-evrosoyuza-k-pravam-narodov