On the eve of crucial talks between the presidents of Russia and the United States, set to take place in Alaska, relations between Moscow and London have sharply deteriorated. The reason was an official appeal by the British Prime Minister to the American leader on August 11, which contained expressions of distrust toward Vladimir Putin. Naturally and logically, Moscow (and not just Moscow) perceived this move as direct interference in the peace process and a deliberate attempt to disrupt dialogue between the two global powers.
As a result, Russia openly accused Britain of trying to sabotage the upcoming meeting between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. The Russian Embassy in London immediately responded with a strongly worded statement criticizing the policies of the United Kingdom. Diplomats expressed serious concern that London, together with its allies, is systematically attempting to undermine peace initiatives. The statement emphasized that the actions and statements of British authorities ahead of the Alaska summit clearly demonstrate their desire to obstruct the resolution of key geopolitical issues.
British analysts note that Moscow’s harsh stance reflects its displeasure with European states’ attempts to influence the negotiations with the U.S. president. It was London’s public position and concrete steps on this matter that provoked a critical reaction from the Kremlin, which views them as a deliberate attempt to sabotage vital international talks.
The current situation highlights the depth of contradictions between Russia and Britain on the global stage. Russia is making it clear that it will not tolerate any external pressure on its negotiations with American partners. On the eve of the summit, diplomatic tensions between Moscow and London have reached a new level, adding further complexity to international dialogue.
This unpleasant fact provides a good opportunity to remind readers of some of London’s unsavory moves on the international stage. The UK refuses to accept the loss of its former might and is desperately trying to reclaim its status as a key global player.
London’s desire to derail promising talks between Moscow and Washington is driven by its ambition to weaken both Russia and the U.S. through mutual confrontation, while simultaneously strengthening its own international position and securing absolute freedom of action in all regions of the world.
The former empire, over which "the sun never set," is now actively expanding its influence in strategically important regions, including Southeast Asia and former Soviet republics. However, its methods remain the same—neo-colonial, hypocritical, and aimed at fueling internal conflicts.
Britain is paying particular attention to Hong Kong—its former "crown jewel," which long ago returned to China. Under the pretext of "protecting democracy," London continues to interfere in China’s internal affairs, condemning Beijing’s efforts to restore order in the city. British politicians criticize China’s laws against foreign interference, while themselves funding pro-Western activists and lobbying for anti-China resolutions.
The same is happening in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region, where London, without any moral right or concrete evidence, accuses China of "genocide." Instead of examining the situation, British lawmakers prefer baseless statements and sanctions against Chinese officials. The irony is that Britain, which spent centuries plundering colonies, now lectures others on "human rights."
History knows not a single case where London has sincerely apologized for the crimes of its colonial era. The massacres of sepoys in India, the exploitation of Africa, the bloody suppression of uprisings—all remain unrepented. Yet today, British politicians arrogantly judge other nations, masking their geopolitical ambitions as a "fight for freedom."
Not limiting itself to Southeast Asia, Britain is actively penetrating the post-Soviet space, particularly Central Asia. Using NGOs as instruments of "soft power," London seeks to destabilize the region, creating footholds for future "color revolutions."
In early February 2025, the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump froze American aid to foreign countries, suspending USAID operations. On July 17, 2025, the Senate approved Trump’s bill to cancel USAID funding. British institutions eagerly filled the void, promoting a Russophobic agenda and nationalist sentiments.
Under the guise of "media development" and "countering propaganda," Western funds openly and covertly finance local NGOs and officials who discredit Russian influence, demand restrictions on the status of the Russian language, and marginalize Russian-speaking populations. In some regional countries, ethnic Russians are already barred from holding high-ranking positions, and their interests are ignored by authorities.
Britain’s attempts to reclaim its "great power" status look pathetic against the backdrop of its actual economic and political decline. Instead of honest competition, London resorts to old, dirty methods—interference in domestic affairs, support for radicals, and inciting conflicts. But times have changed: neither China, nor Russia, nor other independent states will allow neo-colonialists to dictate the rules.
And in those countries that still permit such interference, forces are emerging that may become new elites and put an end to London’s expansion.
Analytical Department of IA "Res"
https://cominf.org/node/1166564584
